:: Related Stories  ::

CBSE withdraw's proposal on NEET
NEW DELHI : On January 9 the Central Board for Secondary Education (CBSE) officially withdrew its proposal from the Supreme Court saying that the National Eligibilitycum-Entrance Test (NEET), a single examination for filling MBBS and dental undergraduate seats in all medical colleges, was not possible this
year.

MCI's surrender to govt irks experts
From Our Correspondent
NEW DELHI : The abject surrender by Medical Council of India's BoG, particularly its chief Dr K K TalwK K Talwarar, in the matter of National Eligibility-cum-Entrance
Test (NEET) 2012 has dimayed the medical fratinity and many medical educationits feel that the MCI BoG is working as a proxy for the Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare.

A senior doctor who was in the earlier BoG went to the extent of saying that the very objectives of the MCI would be defeated if it toes the government line in the matter of academics.

Determined to postpone the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) 2012 for medical graduates by a year, the Health Ministry is now seeking an
amendment to the CBSE's December 21 notification notification that would legally pave way for holding the test from 2013.

The move comes in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent refusal to accept its demand to defer conducting of the NEET, scheduled for May 13, 2012 for the
next academic session of 2013-14.

“Since the apex court has refused to intervene in the matter, now we have no option but to amend the notification (dated December 21, 2010) to postpone the
examination date for May 2013. The Medical Council of India (MCI) has already sent a proposal in this regard to the Health Ministry for its approval,”
sources said.

Sources said, the current BOG could have appealed the Court to allow it to hold the NEET in the non-objecting states. "The CBSE was ready to hold the
examination. Conducting it in some states would have given the Council an idea about the logistics as well as its efficacy."

Last year, the MCI had submitted before the court that the notification had been approved by the Centre as early as in August 2010, a claim contested by the
Health Ministry.

Clearly under pressure from the Ministry, the MCI made a U-turn in the court recently saying that with many States such as Goa and Maharashtra opposing the
national-level common entrance test at under-graduate and post graduate levels, it is not in a position to implement it from 2012-13.

 

SC keeps away from Neet row
NEW DELHI : On December 16 the Centre withdrew its application that sought to defer the common entrance test for all MBBS courses across the country for one more year to 2013, after the Supreme Court said that it would “not become party” to this.

The Union health ministry has now decided to amend its notification for holding the examination in 2013 instead of 2012.

While, it was earlier decided to conduct the exam on May 13, 2012, the Union health ministry had approached the top court earlier this month for allowing them to conduct the National Eligibilitycum-Entrance Test (NEET) for all MBBS courses across the country from 2013 after they received a cold response from various states which opposed the CET.

A bench comprising justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad told the government to “either withdraw your application or we will reject your application. Whatever you want to do you can do but we are not going to be party to your decision.

“All this order (for the single entrance test) was passed after hearing you (Centre). You said draft rules and regulations were in place for implementing it in the academic year 2012-13,” the bench said.

“We will not be party to all these regulations. Why will we be party to it (for deferring the CET). Why are you bringing this matter to the court. You better start and withdraw this application,” the bench said.

A senior official in the ministry said that while the application has been withdrawn already, “we will now amend the notification and defer it for one more year”.

“Things will be more clear if the test is conducted in 2013. Students will get enough time and by then all the matters concerning various states would be taken care of,” the official said.

“However, today the court put the ball in health ministry’s court,” he said.

MCI nod must for foreign doc visits
CHENNAI : No foreign national or NRI medical professional will henceforth be permitted to demonstrate procedures/ surgeries in India without prior permission from the Medical Council of India, says a MCI circular dated February 11.

The circular has been sent to all medical colleges/institutions, state medical councils, all medical associations and hospitals.

Clarifying that prior MCI permission/registration was mandatory, the February 11, 2011 circular, signed by MCI’s additional secretary P Prasanna Raj, said suo motu action would be initiated by the MCI against erring medical colleges/ institutions.

Aimed at verifying the credentials of foreign/ NRI medical professionals participating in continuing medical education (CME) programmes or workshops or post-graduate courses in India, the circular said: ‘‘This is to inform you that all foreign nationals/NRI faculty will have to take prior permission from the MCI in the prescribed form no. MCI-07 available on the website, if he/she demonstrates/conducts any procedure, intervention, surgery, drug therapy, application of any new device or any treatment, on a patient in any CME programmes/ workshop/ PG course or any other programme, conducted by medical college/ hospitals/ medical association or any other organisation in India.’’

The announcement has evoked mixed reactions from the medical fraternity across the country.

While some leading doctors agreed on the need to screen the bona fides of visiting medics, many felt that the proposal would needlessly hamper flow of knowhow and research findings into India.

Dr T D Naidu, president of the All India Medical Association and chairman, Chennai-based DD Medical Hospital and DD Hospital, welcomed the proposal and said verification of the bona fide of the foreign medical professionals by MCI would enhance credibility of the profession. ‘‘Some medical institutions flaunt foreign faculty without conducting due diligence on the professional’s standing and record in his/her home country,” Naidu said.

He also called upon MCI to step in and play an active role in whetting the memorandum of understanding being signed by Indian medical institutions with foreign entities. “A representative of the MCI shall be part of the expert team finalizing the fine print of such MoU,” he said.

While agreeing that prior permission was a must for performing surgeries or live demos on patients, doctors and institute heads said the MCI circular was too restrictive.

 

 MCI told to publicise all assessment reports

NEW DELHI : The Central Information Commission has directed the Medical Council of India (MCI) to post on its web site the assessment reports of medical colleges inspected by it as part of its obligations under the suo motu disclosure clause of the Right to Information Act, reports PTI.

Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also directed the MCI to make public whether the application of a medical college for recognition has been approved or rejected by placing the details on its web site.

Acting on a complaint that the MCI is not fulfiling its statutory obligations under section four of the RTI Act which mandates suo motu disclosure by public authorities, Gandhi directed it to place these two details on its web site.

During the hearing, the MCI cited the problem of displaying the assessment report in its entirety since it could comprise thousands of pages. “After discussions it appears that the Assessment Report which captures essential data would suffice. In view of this, it was agreed that the Public Authority would display the assessment report and whether the application has been approved or rejected by 30 July of each year where applicable,” Gandhi pointed out.

He said in some cases, if an extension has been obtained from the central government for the approval, the information would be displayed within one month of the end of the extension period.

“This would reduce the load of RTI applications being filed with each institution as information would be freely available to citizens and they would not have to apply for it,” he said while asking the MCI to comply with the directions by March 10 next year.

Under pressure, CBSE shelves NEET to 2013-14

From Sanjiv Dube
NEW DELHI :
Succumbing to intense pressure from the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has postponed the proposed National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) to 2013-14.

A CBSE release said on December 12 that "as per communication received from Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India" the CBSE has decided to postpone the "introducation of NEET" to academic year 2013-14".

The release said that the CBSE would now conduct the All India Pre-Medical/Pre-Dental Entrance Examination only for the 15 per cent of all-India quota seats.

Explaining the cause of postponement, the CBSE release said that as several states had sought exemption from the common entrance test for under graduate medical courses, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) decided to postpone the proposed NEET by a year.

According to the new CBSE schedule, the All-India Pre-Medical/Dental Preliminary Examination would be held on April 1, 2012 and the final examination on May 13 -- the day NEET 2012 was to be held.

The eligibility conditions, centres, syllabus, pattern, and related things will remain the same as those of the AIPMT 2011 examination.

The schedule for the submission of application forms would be shortly communicated, the release said.

Health Ministry moves SC for NEET postponement

From Our Correspondent
NEW DELHI :
On December 8 the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare moved the Supreme Court to block the proposed National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) for MBBS and Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) scheduled on May 13 next year.

The Medical Council of India (MCI) and the CBSE are gearing up to hold the NEET on May 13, 2012 and have posted the final syllabus for the NEET, but the Health Ministry wants it to be shelved for a year --- to academic session 2013-14 .

The conduct of undergraduate National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG-NEET) is a Herculean task which requires great deal of preparation and for paucity of time it is practically impossible to resolve the issues raised by various state governments and hold the test in 2012, the Health Ministry pleaded before the apex court.

The ministry cited the objections raised by states like Maharashtra, Gujarat and Goa, who are willing to conduct the national test from 2013-14. It pointed out than Andhra Pradesh is seeking an exemption of two years, Kerala is demanding its reservation policies to be kept intact, Assam is disputing the criteria for minimum marks, West Bengal is insisting on inclusion of Bengali language as a medium for conduct of the said examination and Puducherry is wanting an exemption from the test itself.

Citing various reasons for states not preferring NEET 2012, the Health Ministry said, “The government of India is of the strong view that instead of hurriedly implementing NEET from academic year 2012, it would be in the fitness of things if the same is introduced in a more planned manner from the academic year 2013-14 onwards."

Interestingly, the application has come at a time when the CBSE has moved the apex court seeking permission for holding NEET as per a schedule fixed in consultation with all concerned stakeholders, including the Health Ministry.

The CBSE application said, “All the stakeholders viz CBSE, Medical Council of India and Director General of Health Services have accorded consent for conduct of UG-NEET in the manner indicated above (as per schedule).”

The schedule laid down the last date for receipt of application forms as January 16, 2012, dispatch of admit cards by April 12 and declaration of result latest by last week of June. This schedule, according to CBSE, was taken at a meeting held on July 18, 2011 under the chairmanship of Union Health Secretary. It was this meeting that decided to assign CBSE the task to conduct the first ever national level entrance examination.

Oblivious to the difference of views brewing between the Health Ministry and CBSE, the Supreme Court bench of Justices HL Dattu and CK Prasad had on December 7 adjourned the hearing of the case to January 2012, when both the applications will be taken up for hearing.

Earlier the Health Ministry sources had told Academics India on December 6 that the Ministry would soon submit an affidavit in the apex court to seek postponement of the NEET, citing objections from states like Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu which have most of medical colleges in the country.

They are not against the NEET per se, but they want that the test be conducted from academic session 2013-2014 after framing a common curriculum for Physics, Biology and Chemistry for standards XI and XII, the officials noted.

In case the Supreme Court considers the Ministry’s request, this will be the second time that the NEET will be deferred.

The MCI, following the apex court order, has been preparing for the common medical entrance test since 2011. But it was postponed to 2012 as the Council wanted to give enough time to the students to prepare for the exam.

But while the MCI has been keen to introduce the new system claiming that it would cut down multiplicity of examination, the Health Ministry has been
dilly-dallying the matter citing various reasons, opposition from the States being the major one.

The Ministry’s disinterest in NEET is no secret. It is yet to notify the revised syllabus and the examination system prepared by MCI for medical under
graduates. Irked at the delay, the CBSE too had recently shot off a letter to the Ministry to notify the examination system so that it could smoothly ensure all logistics in place for the D-day.

Over eight lakh students take the MBBS examinations for over 330 medical colleges across the country.

It may be recalled that the Supreme Court had, on March 7, ordered the Central government to hold a single eligibility-cum-entrance examination for MBBS and post-graduate medical courses in the country from this academic session.

Passing the order a bench of justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik said that the admission test will be applicable country-wide, including private medical colleges, except the state of Tamil Nadu where Madras High Court has granted injunction against the common admission test.

The MCI has, therefore, decided to hold the NEET from the year 2012.

SC tells MCI to hold entry test for UG, PG coursee

From Our Correspondent
NEW DELHI :
On March 7, 2011 the Supreme Court ordered the Central government to hold a single eligibility-cum-entrance examination for MBBS and post-graduate medical courses in the country from this academic session.

Passing the order a bench of justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik said that the admission test will be applicable country-wide, including private medical colleges, except the state of Tamil Nadu where Madras High Court has granted injunction against the common admission test.

The Madras High Court has stayed the applicability of the MCI’s December 27, 2010 notification on the ground that the state has its own law on the subject and that the legislation has been approved by the President.

The Medical Council of India (MCI) had, last October, sought the apex court's permission to hold a single common entrance test for graduate and post-graduate medical courses, including those for the private and minority medical colleges.

The bench said that since the MCI, the apex regulator for medical education and training has already issued two notifications for “single entrance” test for graduate (MBBS) and post-graduate (MD/MS) admissions respectively, it was open to the MCI to enforce its orders.

"The pendency of the notifications will not come in the way of putting in place the system of single entrance test as government counsel earlier had submitted that the Centre had given its approval to the scheme," the court ruled.

The apex court rejected the plea of counsel for several medical institutions, especially those from Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh that even the governments of these states had reservation on the “single test” scheme. The bench said so far nobody had challenged the MCI notifications before the court.

After rejecting their plea, the bench in a formal order directed the Centre to notify an organisation for conducting the “single test”.

The Supreme Court, while noting that that Solicitor-General, Mr Gopal Subramaniam, on February 18 had made a statement that the Health Ministry has not “granted its approval” for the test, the bench said : “We fail to understand why they (MCI) need government approval.” “Nothing more is required to be done by the MCI after it has issued the two notifications as everyone has to follow it,” the apex court said, clarifying that the MCI, as the apex regulator for medical education, is competent to act independent of the government on the issue.

Refusing to grant any relief to the CBSE counsel Altaf Ahmed who said that the board has been named as a body for conducting the test for MBBS admissions, the bench said, “You can give your proposal to the government but we will not pass any order.”

The Centre had on December 27 last year, notified that there would be a combined entrance test for MBBS and PG courses.

Although the court had, in an interim order on December 18 last year, allowed the MCI to go ahead with the CET, it had decided to hear the various stakeholders. The state governments, private medical colleges and those run by the minorities were invited to discuss their objections and grievances.

Senior advocate Amrender Sharan and Somesh Jha, appearing for the MCI, pointed out that the Centre had on August 13, last year, taken the stand that the MCI can go ahead with the implementation of the single common entrance criteria and in December the regulations were notified. “It is (now) binding on all the colleges. It is the students who are suffering,” they
said.

The MCI proposal said, “To be eligible for admission to MBBS course for an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate to obtain a minimum of  50 per cent marks in each paper of the test held for the said academic year. But for those belonging to SC, ST and OBC, the minimum percentage shall be 40 per cent in each paper, and for candidates with locomotory disability of lower limbs, it will be 45%.” There will be a single entrance exam each for MBBS and MD courses offered by all 271 medical colleges.

MCI follows BCI, plans a pre-practise exam

From Sanjiv Dube
NEW DELHI:
Taking cue from the Bar Council of India, the Medical Council of India (MCI) intends to introduce an all-India common exit test for graduate doctors. The test will entitle medical graduates to practise medicine and enter the world of medical care.

Presenting the MCI case in the Supreme Court on September 17 Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam told a Bench of Justice R V Raveendran and Justice H L Gokhale that the exit test is under active consideration of the Health Ministry.

Considering the varying standards of medical education in the country the MCI has proposed a common exit examination for MBBS pass-outs intending to become doctors and treat patients, Subramaniam told the Bench.

The first All India Bar Examination, it may be recalled, is to be held on December 5 this year.

The bench was reluctant to entertain Subramaniam and MCI counsel Amarendra Saranthe's plea on single window admission test for post-graduate medical course and refused to pass any order without hearing the opinion of the states.

“How can we pass any direction when there is neither notification nor the regulations before us? The state governments are required to be served with notices and they have to be heard,” said the judges.

The Bench said: "We do not know which all states will object to this and how the students, a volatile community, would react to this proposal. So, let the Centre put before us the proposal and we will seek the response of the state governments."

Tamil Nadu government, it may be recalled, has opposed the decision to have a common entrance test for the PG admission in all the medical colleges in the country following which the Union government has filed an application before the Supreme Court seeking approval to introduce the entrance tests.

Expressing their concern, the judges said a cautious approach has to be taken on the issue as students are a “volatile” community and there are chances that “you (Centre) may land in some other problem”.

Giving the Centre a week to place the proposal before it for issuance of notices to the state governments to elicit their response, the Bench said: "The courts have already contributed to a lot of problems and we do not want to contribute to this by giving a go-bye to the settled procedure."

www.mciindia.org

 

 Best viewed in 1024*768 pixel resolution  |   Disclaimer   |   © Academics-India.com