NEW DELHI : The Central Information Commission has directed the
Medical Council of India (MCI) to post on its web site the assessment
reports of medical colleges inspected by it as part of its obligations
under the suo motu disclosure clause of the Right to Information
Act, reports PTI.
Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also directed the MCI to make
public whether the application of a medical college for recognition has
been approved or rejected by placing the details on its web site.
Acting on a complaint that the MCI is not fulfiling its statutory
obligations under section four of the RTI Act which mandates suo motu
disclosure by public authorities, Gandhi directed it to place these
two details on its web site.
During the hearing, the MCI cited the problem of displaying the assessment
report in its entirety since it could comprise thousands of pages.
“After discussions it appears that the Assessment Report which captures
essential data would suffice. In view of this, it was agreed that the
Public Authority would display the assessment report and whether the
application has been approved or rejected by 30 July of each year where
applicable,” Gandhi pointed out.
He said in some cases, if an extension has been obtained from the central
government for the approval, the information would be displayed within
one month of the end of the extension period.
“This would reduce the load of RTI applications being filed with each
institution as information would be freely available to citizens and
they would not have to apply for it,” he said while asking the MCI to
comply with the directions by March 10 next year.
Under pressure, CBSE shelves NEET to 2013-14
From Sanjiv Dube
NEW DELHI : Succumbing to intense pressure from the Union Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
has postponed the proposed National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET)
to 2013-14.
A CBSE release said on December 12 that "as per communication received
from Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India" the
CBSE has decided to postpone the "introducation of NEET" to academic
year 2013-14".
The release said that the CBSE would now conduct the All India
Pre-Medical/Pre-Dental Entrance Examination only for the 15 per cent of
all-India quota seats.
Explaining the cause of postponement, the CBSE release said that as
several states had sought exemption from the common entrance test for
under graduate medical courses, the Central Board of Secondary Education
(CBSE) decided to postpone the proposed NEET by a year.
According to the new CBSE schedule, the All-India Pre-Medical/Dental
Preliminary Examination would be held on April 1, 2012 and the final
examination on May 13 -- the day NEET 2012 was to be held.
The eligibility conditions, centres, syllabus, pattern, and related
things will remain the same as those of the AIPMT 2011 examination.
The schedule for the submission of application forms would be shortly
communicated, the release said.
Health Ministry moves SC
for NEET postponement
From Our Correspondent
NEW DELHI : On December 8 the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
moved the
Supreme Court to block the proposed National Eligibility-cum-Entrance
Test (NEET) for MBBS and Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) scheduled on May
13 next year.
The Medical Council of India (MCI) and the CBSE are gearing up to hold
the NEET on May 13, 2012 and have posted the
final syllabus
for the NEET, but the Health Ministry wants it to be shelved
for a year --- to academic session 2013-14 .
The conduct of undergraduate National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG-NEET)
is a Herculean task which requires great deal of preparation and for
paucity of time it is practically impossible to resolve the issues
raised by various state governments and hold the test in 2012, the
Health Ministry pleaded before the apex court.
The ministry cited the objections raised by states like Maharashtra,
Gujarat and Goa, who are willing to conduct the national test from
2013-14. It pointed out than Andhra Pradesh is seeking an exemption of
two years, Kerala is demanding its reservation policies to be kept
intact, Assam is disputing the criteria for minimum marks, West Bengal
is insisting on inclusion of Bengali language as a medium for conduct of
the said examination and Puducherry is wanting an exemption from the
test itself.
Citing various reasons for states not preferring NEET 2012, the Health
Ministry said, “The government of India is of the strong view that
instead of hurriedly implementing NEET from academic year 2012, it would
be in the fitness of things if the same is introduced in a more planned
manner from the academic year 2013-14 onwards."
Interestingly, the application has come at a time when the CBSE has moved
the apex court seeking permission for holding NEET as per a schedule
fixed in consultation with all concerned stakeholders, including the
Health Ministry.
The CBSE application said, “All the stakeholders viz CBSE, Medical
Council of India and Director General of Health Services have accorded
consent for conduct of UG-NEET in the manner indicated above (as per
schedule).”
The schedule laid down the last date for receipt of application forms as
January 16, 2012, dispatch of admit cards by April 12 and declaration of
result latest by last week of June. This schedule, according to CBSE,
was taken at a meeting held on July 18, 2011 under the chairmanship of
Union Health Secretary. It was this meeting that decided to assign CBSE
the task to conduct the first ever national level entrance examination.
Oblivious to the difference of views brewing between the Health Ministry
and CBSE, the Supreme Court bench of Justices HL Dattu and CK Prasad had
on December 7 adjourned the hearing of the case to January 2012, when
both the applications will be taken up for hearing.
Earlier the
Health Ministry sources had told Academics India on December 6 that
the Ministry would soon submit an affidavit in the apex court to seek
postponement of the NEET, citing objections from states like Karnataka,
Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu which have most of medical
colleges in the country.
They are not against the NEET per se, but they want that the test
be conducted from academic session 2013-2014 after framing a common
curriculum for Physics, Biology and Chemistry for standards XI and XII,
the officials noted.
In case the Supreme Court considers the Ministry’s request, this will be
the second time that the NEET will be deferred.
The MCI, following the apex court order, has been preparing for the
common medical entrance test since 2011. But it was postponed to 2012 as
the Council wanted to give enough time to the students to prepare for
the exam.
But while the MCI has been keen to introduce the new system claiming
that it would cut down multiplicity of examination, the Health Ministry
has been
dilly-dallying the matter citing various reasons, opposition from the
States being the major one.
The Ministry’s disinterest in NEET is no secret. It is yet to notify the
revised syllabus and the examination system prepared by MCI for medical
under
graduates. Irked at the delay, the CBSE too had recently shot off a
letter to the Ministry to notify the examination system so that it could
smoothly ensure all logistics in place for the D-day.
Over eight lakh students take the MBBS examinations for over 330 medical
colleges across the country.
It may be recalled that the Supreme Court had, on March 7, ordered the Central
government to hold a single eligibility-cum-entrance examination
for MBBS and post-graduate medical courses in the country from this
academic session.
Passing the order a bench of justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik
said that the admission test will be applicable country-wide, including
private medical colleges, except the state of Tamil Nadu where Madras
High Court has granted injunction against the common admission test.
The MCI has, therefore, decided to hold the NEET from the year 2012.
SC
tells MCI to hold entry test for UG, PG coursee
From Our Correspondent
NEW DELHI : On March 7, 2011 the Supreme Court ordered the Central
government to hold a single eligibility-cum-entrance examination
for MBBS and post-graduate medical courses in the country from this
academic session.
Passing the order a bench of justices R V Raveendran and A K Patnaik
said that the admission test will be applicable country-wide, including
private medical colleges, except the state of Tamil Nadu where Madras
High Court has granted injunction against the common admission test.
The Madras High Court has stayed the applicability of the MCI’s December
27, 2010 notification on the ground that the state has its own law on
the subject and that the legislation has been approved by the President.
The Medical Council of India (MCI) had, last October, sought the apex
court's permission to hold a single common entrance test for graduate
and post-graduate medical courses, including those for the private and
minority medical colleges.
The bench said that since the MCI, the apex regulator for medical
education and training has already issued two notifications for “single
entrance” test for graduate (MBBS) and post-graduate (MD/MS) admissions
respectively, it was open to the MCI to enforce its orders.
"The pendency of the notifications will not come in the way of putting
in place the system of single entrance test as government counsel
earlier had submitted that the Centre had given its approval to the
scheme," the court ruled.
The apex court rejected the plea of counsel for several medical
institutions, especially those from Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh that
even the governments of these states had reservation on the “single
test” scheme. The bench said so far nobody had challenged the MCI
notifications before the court.
After rejecting their plea, the bench in a formal order directed the
Centre to notify an organisation for conducting the “single test”.
The Supreme Court, while noting that that Solicitor-General, Mr Gopal
Subramaniam, on February 18 had made a statement that the Health
Ministry has not “granted its approval” for the test, the bench said :
“We fail to understand why they (MCI) need government approval.”
“Nothing more is required to be done by the MCI after it has issued the
two notifications as everyone has to follow it,” the apex court said,
clarifying that the MCI, as the apex regulator for medical education, is
competent to act independent of the government on the issue.
Refusing to grant any relief to the CBSE counsel Altaf Ahmed who said
that the board has been named as a body for conducting the test for MBBS
admissions, the bench said, “You can give your proposal to the
government but we will not pass any order.”
The Centre had on December 27 last year, notified that there would be a
combined entrance test for MBBS and PG courses.
Although the court had, in an interim order on December 18 last year,
allowed the MCI to go ahead with the CET, it had decided to hear the
various stakeholders. The state governments, private medical colleges
and those run by the minorities were invited to discuss their objections
and grievances.
Senior advocate Amrender Sharan and Somesh Jha, appearing for the MCI,
pointed out that the Centre had on August 13, last year, taken the stand
that the MCI can go ahead with the implementation of the single common
entrance criteria and in December the regulations were notified. “It is
(now) binding on all the colleges. It is the students who are
suffering,” they
said.
The MCI proposal said, “To be eligible for admission to MBBS course for
an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate to obtain a
minimum of 50 per cent marks in each paper of the test held for
the said academic year. But for those belonging to SC, ST and OBC, the
minimum percentage shall be 40 per cent in each paper, and for
candidates with locomotory disability of lower limbs, it will be 45%.”
There will be a single entrance exam each for MBBS and MD courses
offered by all 271 medical colleges.
MCI
follows BCI, plans a pre-practise exam
From Sanjiv Dube
NEW DELHI:
Taking cue from the Bar Council of India, the Medical Council of India
(MCI) intends to introduce an all-India common exit test for graduate
doctors. The test will entitle medical graduates to practise medicine
and enter the world of medical care.
Presenting the MCI case in the Supreme Court on September 17 Solicitor
General Gopal Subramaniam told a Bench of Justice R V Raveendran and
Justice H
L Gokhale that the exit test is under active consideration of the Health
Ministry.
Considering the varying standards of medical education in the country
the MCI has proposed a common exit examination for MBBS pass-outs
intending to become doctors and treat patients, Subramaniam told the
Bench.
The first All India Bar Examination, it may be recalled, is to be held
on December 5 this year.
The bench was reluctant to entertain Subramaniam and MCI counsel
Amarendra Saranthe's plea on single window admission test for
post-graduate medical course and refused to pass any order without
hearing the opinion of the states.
“How can we pass any direction when there is neither notification nor
the regulations before us? The state governments are required to be
served with notices and they have to be heard,” said the judges.
The Bench said: "We do not know which all states will object to this and
how the students, a volatile community, would react to this proposal.
So, let the Centre put before us the proposal and we will seek the
response of the state governments."
Tamil Nadu government, it may be recalled, has opposed the decision to have a common entrance test for the PG
admission in all the medical colleges in the country following which the Union government has filed an application before the Supreme Court
seeking approval to introduce the entrance tests.
Expressing their concern, the judges said a cautious approach has to be
taken on the issue as students are a “volatile” community and there are
chances that “you (Centre) may land in some other problem”.
Giving the Centre a week to place the proposal before it for issuance of
notices to the state governments to elicit their response, the Bench
said: "The courts have already contributed to a lot of problems and we
do not want to contribute to this by giving a go-bye to the settled
procedure."