:: Related Stories ::
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Patna
High Court rejects appointment of two VCs |
|
From Our Correspondent
PATNA : On May 4 Patna High Court quashed the appointment of two
state universities' vice-chancellors on the ground that the Chancellor
did not consult the state government before making the appointments.
The single judge bench of Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi held illegal the
appointment of Arvind Kumar and Subhash Prasad Sinha as vice-chancellors
of Magadh University in Bodhgaya and Veer Kuer Singh University in Ara,
respectively. Both were appointed by Governor-Chancellor Devanand Konwar.
“The said appointments of private respondents (VCs of MU and VKSU),
which were made without consultation with the state government as
envisaged under Section 10 (2) of the Bihar State Universities Act, are
quashed and it is declared that the appointment of two private
respondents are void ab initio (invalid from the very
inception),” Justice Tripathi said.
The appointment of the VCs was challenged by Pramod Kumar Singh, a
teacher of SP Jain College in Ara on the ground that they had been made
in violation of Section 10 (2) of the Bihar State University Act of
1976, which says that the Chancellor should consult the state government
before filling such posts.
During the course of hearing, the Chancellor’s counsel had shown file
notings wherein he (the chancellor) had, in his hand, scribbled on the
left side of a file pertaining to the constitution of a universities
tribunal bill to show that consultation had taken place with the
government regarding appointment of the vice-chancellors.
“The court has meticulously gone through the said note of the Chancellor
which has been purportedly made in his own pen. The first thing which
the court notices is that the note does not have any initial of the
minister and it has been incorporated in a file not even related to the
question of appointment of VCs to the universities of Bihar, much less
the universities in question,” the court said in its 41-page judgment.
The chancellor’s counsel, Y.V. Giri, said: “We have not read the
judgment. I can’t say at the moment whether or not we will go in for an
appeal.” |
|
|
|
|