From Our Correspondent
CALCUTTA : Trinamul Congress' first official
stand on Higher Education became obvious on March 1
when the West Bengal government declared the search
committee for the Calcutta University
vice-chancellor's selection.
The search committee comprises eminent sociologist
Anil Kakodkar who is the Chancellor's nominee
and would, therefore, head the search committee. The
other two named are University Senate nominee Andre
Béteille and the UGC nominee Prof Mushirul Hasan.
The names give a clear indication of the fact that
the intention is to select an apolitical academician
of repute without consideration of caste or creed
and the move is being seen as the first step towards
depoliticising higher education.
The search committee has been commissioned to
suggest a panel of three names by April 30, when the
term of the present vice-chancellor Suranjan Das
expires.
The persons named are all eminent of which Andre
Béteille, the Senate nominee, is to be watched
closely as he is the man who would be expected to
push for university's interest -- it would be he who
would push the outgoing VC's name for a second term.
Moreover the presence of leftist historian and a
friend Mushirul Hasan would add weight to Suranjan
Das. In fact the people in the know of things say
the battle is already half won.
According to the newly passed West Bengal University
Laws (Amendment) Act, 2011 "The Vice Chancellor
shall be appointed by the Chancellor out of the
panel of three names recommended in order of
preference by the Search Committee constituted
by the State Government." This leaves little space
for the Chancellor.
Earlier, the Chancellor used to select the VC from a
panel prepared by the University Senate, that used
to be the Left Front’s fief.
Chancellor Narayanan who chaired the reorganised
Senate meet on March 1 suggested Béteille's name who
is a local celebrity.
Other universities too are in the process of
restructuring the administrative bodies. Apart from
Calcutta University, the VCs of Jadavpur University,
West Bengal State University, West Bengal University
of Technology will be also completing their terms
within the next few months. The state higher
education department asked the UGC to provide the
names of the nominees so that search committees for
these universities too can be formed soon. “We
should be quick to complete the process,” Narayanan
told reporters.
Bengal
varsities bill gets governor's approval
CALCUTTA : On January 23
West Bengal Governor M.K. Narayanan signed the
controversial West Bengal University Laws (Amendment)
Bill, 2011 which was passed in the
winter session of the Assembly.
Raj Bhavan sources said the bill
had been sent to the government for issuing gazette
notification. Once the notification is issued, the
universities would start setting up decision-making
bodies such as senate.
Bengal
varsities' bill passed with 14 changes
CALCUTTA : On December 23 the West Bengal assembly
passed the controversial West Bengal University Laws
(Amendment) Bill, 2011 amidst uproar and clamour for
multiple amendments.
Of the 126 proposals for amendment, 99 came from the
Opposition, 14 from government ally SUCI and 13 from the
Treasury benches. The Speaker Mr Biman Bandopadhyay
accepted all the 13 amendments suggested by the ruling
party and one from the lone SUCI member, Tarun Naskar,
but rejected the remaining 112.
“We had three very clear intentions behind bringing in
the bill,” education minister Bratya Basu said at the
end of the three-hour discussion on the West Bengal
University Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2011, which will lay
down the law for 13 state-aided universities.
Basu said the state government’s main intention was to
end political interference in the running of
institutions of higher learning. The other two
objectives were: bringing in transparency in the
management of universities and giving academics a free
hand in taking decisions.
“By bringing in the bill, the government has succeeded
in throwing out the representatives of registered
graduates from the universities’ policymaking bodies,” a
former vice-chancellor of a state university said.
“The Left government had brought in the registered
graduates (as a constituency) to keep their control over
the universities.”
The bill also empowers the Chancellor to remove
vice-chancellors (mostly political
appointees) and gives the vice-chancellors the final
word in faculty recruitment.
Left MLAs opposed many of the 71-page bill’s provisions
and said they would carry on with their protests even
outside the House.
Leader of the Opposition Surjya Kanta Mishra demanded
that the bill be forwarded to the select committee of
the Assembly for proper scrutiny.
During the House discussion, Anisur Rahman of the CPM
had accused the government of bringing in the bill in
haste.
“The government itself has brought 13 amendments. This
shows that the government had drafted the bill in
haste,” Rahman said.
Minister Basu, however, said in his speech that the
bill’s passage would help achieve the goal of academic
excellence in the universities.
“We also want to make it clear that the government will
welcome more discussions with the Opposition MLAs to
make the legislation more effective,” he said.
The 13 amendments proposed by Trinamul Congress members
included one to induct the Madhyamik board’s president
into the university courts (in case of Calcutta
University, it is the senate).
Another amendment made the vice-chancellors the final
authority in faculty recruitment, laying down that the
selection committees’ recommendations be referred to
them. In the original bill, the recommendations were
supposed to be sent to the executive councils (the
syndicate in case of Calcutta University).
Replying to this allegations, education minister Mr
Bratya Basu said: “Left had changed the acts thrice
after coming to power in the '70s. We are not claiming
perfection. But we will continue with our attempts to
achieve excellence, de-politicisation of education and
transparency.”